Professor Mike Barnes, Co-Founder of Maple Tree Consultancy states that the UK’s clinicians need training in medical cannabis and explains precisely why this should be
On 1st November 2018, the UK’s Home Secretary announced changes to the scheduling of cannabis under the Misuse of Drugs Act of 2001. Previously in Schedule I, labelled as having ‘no medical value’, cannabis was moved into Schedule II and specialist doctors allowed to prescribe.
The legalisation of cannabis-based medicines gave thousands of people with chronic illnesses a glimmer of hope. Yet two years on from these historic changes, just three people have been given cannabis prescriptions through the NHS (excepting Epidyolex and Sativex) and only 2,000 people have managed to access the medicines privately. (1) This is despite approximately 1.4 million people desperately needing access to medical cannabis to alleviate their chronic health conditions. (2)
Medical cannabis in the healthcare community
There are several reasons for this, but the problem largely lies in the lack of understanding of medical cannabis amongst the healthcare community. This boils down to two distinct areas. Firstly, although there have been trials of CBPMs across the world, the UK typically favours research conducted on its own soil. This is problematic, as the Randomised Control Trials (RCTs) that medicines rigorously go through before being commissioned by the NHS have not been conducted for the majority of cannabis-based medicinal products and in any case, is the wrong model for a botanical product rather than a pharmaceutical product. This has resulted in a lack of long-term data available to the clinicians to study and learn from. Secondly, there is a distinct lack of meaningful training for medics concerning medical cannabis, meaning there is simply a lack of confidence in doctors to prescribe the treatments.
So, despite over 80,000+ doctors now being legally permitted to prescribe medical cannabis on the Specialist Register of the General Medical Council, only a small handful are currently prescribing. NICE produced inadequate guidance on medical cannabis and doctors were cautioned against prescribing medical cannabis treatments for conditions such as epilepsy, chronic pain and anxiety, despite there being good, international evidence that the drugs can help to alleviate symptoms. With very little guidance being given to NHS doctors around how to safely prescribe cannabis, this is an issue which will continue to be detrimental to the fledgling market until it is addressed.
For this issue to be solved, firstly, other study designs must be considered, such as observational studies and patient audit studies. For example, through Project Twenty21, a study launched by Drug Science in 2019 to supply up to 20,000 patients with medical cannabis by the end of 2021, it is hoped that evidence will be gathered to help progress patient access to medical cannabis in the UK. Additionally, doctors need to be specifically trained in the endocannabinoid system alongside the medical efficacy of the cannabis plant, the evidence around its use and how to prescribe products. Only then will they be able to identify and implement the appropriate cannabis medicine care plans for their patients.
This should be a simple issue to address, by establishing a range of educational programmes for doctors and healthcare professionals across the country. However, cannabis continues to be an extremely political issue, which is largely to blame for the significant gap between policy and implementation. The lack of patient access is particularly perverse, given that the UK is one of the largest producers of medical cannabis in the world. In 2016, it produced 44% of global cannabis plants intended for medical and scientific research. Much of this is exported to other countries who turn it into medicinal products, which the UK subjects to import restrictions.
The future of training in medical cannabis
The current system just isn’t working, and hundreds of thousands of people are being failed by the UK Government and medical community shortcomings. For the barriers to come down, firstly, the political community needs to recognise the vital lifeline medical cannabis can provide for patients and make moves to establish a UK cannabis industry independent of the NHS. Following this, the medical community must ensure that medical cannabis is properly covered in the medical training programmes.
Two years have been wasted, and thousands of lives have already been impacted. Medical cannabis access is by no means a simple issue, but further study, coupled with comprehensive training are a vital piece needed to solve the puzzle.
References
I have spent the last 5 years of my life, after I cured my own skin cancer, reframing the argument that has been spinning like a useless merry go round for over for a century now.
There have always been very powerful groups of men that have profited enormously from the cartels that they have created. And the cheap and natural cure for ‘all’ addictions and ‘most’ suffering and sickness had to be kept spinning – just out of reach – shrouded by myths, lies, propaganda and a UN sponsored set of immoral Genocidal Laws for all countries to follow, without any scientific foundation evidence as there base.
So, instead of arguing that cannabis is a medicine or arguing that private citizens should be free to make their own choices, or even arguing about our ancient Human Rights, I have taken a completely different tack to end this.
Using a 1:100 ratio of Full Extract Cannabis Oil to any absorbing skin cream (Nivea etc), will in fact produce a novel treatment that will cure basal cell carcinoma in about 2 weeks. And this is currently untreatable within the system of Medicine that we use in the World today, and as such would put this Skin Cancer Creme into a completely new classification.
The WMA – Helsinki Declaration states that:
– “Medical progress is based on research that ultimately must include studies involving human subjects.”
– “In the treatment of an individual patient, where proven interventions do not exist or other known interventions have been ineffective, the physician, after seeking expert advice, with informed consent from the patient or a legally authorised representative, may use an unproven intervention if in the physician’s judgement it offers hope of saving life, re-establishing health or alleviating suffering. This intervention should subsequently be made the object of research, designed to evaluate its safety and efficacy. In all cases, new information must be recorded and, where appropriate, made publicly available.”
So, seeing as the scientific community has been banned from doing any form of testing or trials in this field, that would make ‘me’ the expert that they would be seeking advice from – Because I have dedicated over half a decade of my life into studying this, and testing full spectrum cannabis plant extracts on willing volunteers, and the results are truly outstanding, once the secrets are revealed, from inside this incredible DNA coded into these healing Plants.
I am not starting the same arguments here, I am starting a ‘New Argument’ to mount a legal case against the World Administration that this is in fact Genocide, and anybody can prove it easily by curing horrible skin cancers within in a matter of weeks – without pain, or side-effects, or psychoactive effects so the psychologists can be silenced also.
Best Regards,
Magnus