IT decision makers could be stuck in a reactive mentality on cybersecurity as they face major challenges between dynamic adversaries, significant legislation and regulation requirements
Ideally, business requirements would be the key motivator for an organisation’s approach to cybersecurity strategy. But, nearly two out of three U.K.-based IT and security decision-makers say their security programme is continuously reactive due to constantly changing legislation, threats, and other external factors, according to a new research report from Optiv Security.
They further have to negotiate business digital transformation needs and a rapidly-growing array of technology solutions.
The report, “Enterprise Attitudes to Cybersecurity: Tackling the Modern Threat Landscape,” takes an in-depth look at modern cybersecurity practices, as well as evolving requirements and strategies to balance risk and business acceleration.
58% of IT leaders find it challenging to get their Boards to spend money on Cybersecurity Programmes
The changing technology landscape is having a large influence on cybersecurity strategy. The proliferation of mobile applications has either a major or significant impact on 79% of businesses – even more so than the need to understand gaps in their current security programmes. Cloud-based technologies follow closely behind, with 77% citing the migration to the cloud as having either a major or significant impact.
Simon Church, Optiv’s general manager in Europe said:
“Security teams that focus purely on the external threat are being left behind by the pace of business and digital change.
“We are seeing a significant shift to a ‘business-first’ perspective among cyber leaders, which balances risk with the imperatives of the modern enterprise. However, many organisations are still married to the antiquated outside-in model, which is predicated on buying security technologies based on the latest trends and vulnerabilities in a problem and responsible manner.
“This approach allows the landscape, rather than enterprise objectives, to dictate security infrastructure and operations, and often ignores the other important elements of a successful security programme – people and process.”
The research also finds that wider business buy-in is a challenge. Nearly three in five IT leaders feel that obtaining buy-in for their security programmes is tough, primarily because of a lack of understanding from the board.
Almost a third view this lack of understanding as a primary roadblock to delivering their preferred strategy, and just 23% feel like the rest of the business understands their security strategy extremely well. In 56% of businesses, IT formulates a security programme strategy but requires board sign off to begin. And, in nearly a quarter of cases, the board dictates the strategy down to the organisation. Church further commented:
“Many organisations struggle to successfully measure and report cybersecurity ROI against corporate business goals.”
“In fact, according to our research, only one-third of organisations actually report back to their business on the success of their programme with either a live dashboard or regular reports showing key metrics. By strengthening reporting, IT decision makers can better secure buy-in and demonstrate the value of their security strategies and solutions.”
The research identifies that more than a quarter of respondents believe their security works extremely well. But increasingly, enterprises don’t just want effectiveness.
They want simplicity.
When asked how much emphasis businesses would place on different factors if they could rebuild their programmes from scratch, respondents say they would put 32% of their focus on simplicity, a 9% increase over the current state.
“The challenge is that the world continues to change and evolve at an accelerating pace.”
“Everyone is aware of the exponential growth and the impact on global economies and businesses due to globalisation, internet and cloud business models, digital transformation, mobility – all radically changing industries that are being completely re-invented.
“The result of these transformations and the existing security approach is a cyber world that is overly and unnecessarily complex and underperforming. Our research confirms that the industry needs a new perspective, a new approach, and a new delivery and consumption model for cybersecurity that results in better outcomes. The industry needs an approach that puts business strategy and risk at the heart of cyber decision-making.”
